Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-06-20 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge (2024), getting a 79.5 score against 78.5. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is an notably older cellphone than the Motorola Edge (2024), but Samsung managed to build it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy S7 features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has lesser cpu cores (although they are faster) and 4 GB lesser RAM memory.
The Galaxy S7 features a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge (2024), because although it has a much smaller screen and way less brightness, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge (2024) counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge (2024) also counts with a back camera with way more MP and a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S7 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.