Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), getting a 79.5 score against 78.9. Galaxy S7 features an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S7 has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less cores (although faster).
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) takes better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much higher video definition. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.