Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, with an 87.1 score against 79.5. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer device than the Samsung Galaxy S7, although it's much heavier and a little thicker. Galaxy S7 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a display that is very similar to Galaxy S7's display, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot worse pixel density, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a much larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, faster video frame rate and a way larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.