Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, with an 82.6 score against 79.5. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus design is incredibly newer than Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a better looking screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better display pixels density.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Moto G 5G Plus also has more cores.
Moto G 5G Plus counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Moto G 5G Plus has a superior camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.