Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Power's overall score of 76.1. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is much older than Moto G Power, it's body is thinner and noticeably lighter. The Moto G Power counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Moto G Power also has a larger number of cores (but slower).
Galaxy S7 features a much sharper screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixels count per display inch. Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Moto G Power counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Moto G Power takes just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Moto G Power also counts with a way more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.