Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), having a 79.5 score against 76. The Galaxy S7 is an incredibly older device than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but Samsung made it extremely lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better looking screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher screen density. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a way smaller sensor which gives a way lower image and video quality and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.