Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, with an 86.2 score against 79.5. Moto G200 5G's construction is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it's heavier and thicker. The Moto G200 5G features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cores.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a sharper screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater number of pixels per display inch. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Moto G200 5G features a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G200 5G has a much better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.