Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 72.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-03-11 | 2016-05-18 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 127.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 576 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is better than the Moto G4 Plus, getting a 79.5 score against 72.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy S7 and the Moto G4 Plus were only released 2 months apart, Samsung Galaxy S7 is a bit lighter and notably thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit better processor than Moto G4 Plus, although it has lesser cpu cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a lot better looking screen than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels number per inch of display. The Moto G4 Plus has a better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 72 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage.
The Moto G4 Plus features a battery duration that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy S7's battery duration. The Galaxy S7 features a bit better camera than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a much better video quality.
Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.