Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-12-20 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than Moto G51 5G, getting a score of 79.5 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy S7's design is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter than Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before. Galaxy S7 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher pixels density.
The Moto G51 5G features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Moto G51 5G has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G51 5G also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also counts with higher video frame rate and a camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Moto G51 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.