Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than the Moto G8 Power, with a 79.5 score against 76. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S7 is notably older than Moto G8 Power, it's design is thinner and notably lighter. The Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G8 Power also has more cores (although they are slower).
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Moto G8 Power counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G8 Power features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a camera with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G8 Power features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S7 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.