Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G84 is slightly better than Galaxy S7, having an 80.9 score against 79.5. Moto G84's design is newer, just a little thinner and noticeably lighter than the Galaxy S7. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has a much smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G84 has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy S7 has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G84, although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores (but faster).
The Moto G84 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Moto G84 also counts with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera, better 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Moto G84 has a much longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.