Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-03-11 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than Moto Z Force, with a score of 79.5 against 75.8. Even though Samsung Galaxy S7 and Moto Z Force were only released with a couple months difference, Samsung Galaxy S7's construction is a bit thicker but a bit lighter than Moto Z Force. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a processor that's very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy S7, both have 4 GB of RAM and 4 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels per inch of display. Motorola Moto Z Force shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a lot higher 21 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 17% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.