Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-03-11 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. Although the Galaxy S7 and Moto Z Force Droid Edition were released only 5 months apart, Galaxy S7's body is just a bit lighter but also just a bit thicker than Moto Z Force Droid Edition.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a brighter screen than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also counts with a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition and Galaxy S7 feature similar processing units, both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.