Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-03-11 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Even though Samsung Galaxy S7 is noticeably older and thicker than Moto Z3 Play, it's body is still just a little lighter. The Galaxy S7 features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, although it has 4 lesser cores (although they are faster), they both have the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy S7 has a much sharper screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Moto Z3 Play features a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S7 takes clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate, the same video resolution and a 12 mega pixels camera in the back, the Galaxy S7 also has a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy S7 and the Moto Z3 Play both feature incredibly similar batteries.
Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.