Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7, having a overall score of 84.6 against 79.5. Although the Motorola One 5G is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy S7, it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Motorola One 5G features a bit better processor than Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One 5G also has a higher number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much better looking display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Motorola One 5G features a better camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One 5G also has a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola One 5G has much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S7, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.