Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 overall score. Motorola One Hyper's construction is noticeably newer than Galaxy S7's, although it is thicker and heavier. Galaxy S7 counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola One Hyper has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger number of cores (although they are slower). The Motorola One Hyper features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Hyper shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution. Motorola One Hyper features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.