Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has an overall score of 80, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. The Motorola One Zoom is a extremely newer phone than Samsung Galaxy S7, although it's somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola One Zoom also has 4 more cpu cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixel density. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports 72 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Motorola One Zoom shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.7 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola One Zoom has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.