Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S7, but it is much heavier. Motorola razr (2020) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and more CPU cores.
Galaxy S7 has a way better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola razr (2020) has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a larger sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S7 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S7, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.