Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | -- |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s overall score of 79.2. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a way better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores. The Galaxy S7 features an incredibly better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has much worse brightness and a really smaller screen.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.