Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S7 construction is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though it was released 4 years before. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and 4 more cores.
Galaxy S7 has a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher screen density. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a back camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality pictures.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S7 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.