Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. The Galaxy S7 is an incredibly older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but Samsung managed to make it a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, more pixels per display inch and a brighter screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a camera with a much better resolution and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.