Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-04-14 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 score. The Galaxy S7 is a lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but both of them are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy S7 features a bit sharper screen than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has a lot smaller display and way darker display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a bit better processor than Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores. The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.