Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a 79.5 score against 77. The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a lighter but a little thicker phone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 features a bit better display than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density, a quite brighter display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.