Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A15 5G, having a score of 79.5 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S7's design is just a little thinner and a lot lighter than the Galaxy A15 5G, although it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 features a better screen than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a quite more display brightness, a better pixel quantity in each display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Galaxy A15 5G features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A15 5G shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S7 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.