Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A34 is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7, with a general score of 82.9 against 79.5. Galaxy A34 is a noticeably lighter and a lot thinner device than Galaxy S7. The Galaxy A34 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A34 also has more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixels count in each inch in the display. Galaxy A34 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A34, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy A34 has a superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.