Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, having a global score of 79.5 against 79.4. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy S7 is way older than Galaxy A35 5G, it's body is incredibly lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Galaxy S7 has a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a brighter display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a lot brighter screen, a better count of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy A35 5G has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A35 5G takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A35 5G features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.