Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than Galaxy S7, having a 90.8 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is noticeably newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy S7. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater amount of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A51 5G features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more 2.2 GHz CPU cores and 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy S7, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.