Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having a 79.5 score against 76.9. Galaxy S7 is a somewhat lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but they are 0.31inches thick. The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and more cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 has a way better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy S7 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also has a bigger camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.