Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is much better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. The Galaxy S10 Lite design is newer than the Galaxy S7's, but it's just a little thicker and heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
Galaxy S7 features a better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better amount of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos, a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and better video frame rate.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.