Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, getting a 79.5 score against 76. Samsung Galaxy S7's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, but it is notably lighter. Galaxy S7 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has way less brightness and a really smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display.
Galaxy S7 has a much better processing power than Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster). Galaxy S24 FE counts with a better storage for games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S24 FE counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy S7 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, because although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S7 is also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.