Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is noticeably lighter and much thinner than Galaxy S7. The Galaxy S7 has a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster).
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S7, because although it has a much lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen and way more brightness. Galaxy S25 features more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S25 takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a way more megapixels back camera, a much bigger sensor and a way higher video definition.
Galaxy S25 features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 33% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S25, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S7, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.