Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's global score of 77.6. Samsung Galaxy S7 is an way older phone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's much lighter and way thinner anyway. Galaxy S7 counts with a much better screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display density.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a very superior processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 35% more battery size. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments and a much bigger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.