Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 576 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. Even though Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than Galaxy S7, it's a lot heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. They have the same pixels density, a screen with the same size and an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560. Galaxy S7 takes way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a 12 MP resolution camera, the Galaxy S7 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S7, because it has more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy S7, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.