Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. Galaxy XCover Pro is a incredibly newer device than Galaxy S7, although it's way heavier and notably thicker. Samsung Galaxy S7 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more cpu cores. Galaxy XCover Pro features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Samsung Galaxy S7, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a much tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 35% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S7, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.