Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7, getting a general score of 85.6 against 79.5. Galaxy Z Flip 3's construction is newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it's also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores.
The Galaxy S7 has a sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh. Galaxy S7 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy S7 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 3, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy S7, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.