Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S7, but it is somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 10 percent more battery size. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality photographs and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a 12 megapixels resolution back camera, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S7. If you want to save some money, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.