Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7, with a 91.1 score against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a a lot thinner but notably heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S7. Galaxy S7 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a lot more opaque screen, a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a way smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a very superior processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a lower number of cores and 12 GB less RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 47% bigger battery size. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much more MP camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S7. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.