Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7's overall score of 79.5. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is a lot newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7. Samsung Galaxy S7 features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels count in each inch of display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, a camera with much more mega pixels and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.