Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-06-17 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Metal and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is slightly better than the Galaxy S7, with an 82.2 score against 79.5. The Xiaomi Mi 9T construction is incredibly newer, but notably heavier and thicker than Galaxy S7. Galaxy S7 features a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a much brighter screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a lot better resolution back camera and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.