Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-07-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, having a score of 79.5 against 79.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy S7 is incredibly older than the Xiaomi Mi A3, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter. Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much higher display pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a superior camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing images and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality photographs.
Xiaomi Mi A3 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi A3 features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 34% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.