Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 88.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-09-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.85 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 8.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2250 x 2088 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 389 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a general score of 88.9, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 general score. Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha's body is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it is a lot thicker and notably heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same video definition, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha also has a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with way more megapixels.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Alpha counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 35% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.