Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's score of 78.2. The Galaxy S7 body is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Poco M3, although it was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S7 features a way better screen than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixels density.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a higher number of cores.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.