Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, with a 79.5 score against 78.3. Samsung Galaxy S7's construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, even though it was released 5 years before. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 also has more processing cores.
The Galaxy S7 has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has way darker display and a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S7 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.