Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-05-26 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's overall score of 79.5. Galaxy S7's construction is much lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. The Galaxy S7 counts with a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 200 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G also has a larger number of 2.2 gigahertz cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's camera is very similar to Galaxy S7's camera, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot better resolution camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality photos.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.