Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7's 79.5 score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's construction is incredibly newer than Galaxy S7's, but it's a little thicker and extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and way darker screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S7. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S7, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.