Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting a global score of 79.5 against 78.2. Even though Galaxy S7 is notably older than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's construction is a little thinner and somewhat lighter. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S7 has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a way smaller display and much darker screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher screen pixel density. The Galaxy S7 has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 200 GB.
Galaxy S7 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because although it has a much less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.