Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | -- |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 general score. The Galaxy S7 body is just a little thinner and extremely lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Samsung Galaxy S7 has an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM and lesser cores.
Galaxy S7 has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 2560px resolution, a really smaller screen and way more opaque display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.