Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2710 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | 1800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a global score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7's 79.5 score. Samsung Galaxy S7 has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has an extremely better processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a much higher resolution back camera, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 70 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.