Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, having an 85.4 score against 81.9. The LG K92 is a newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has just a bit better processing power than LG K92, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S8 Active counts with a brighter display than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The LG K92 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG K92 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a camera with lot more MP.
The LG K92 has a battery life that's just as good as Galaxy S8 Active's battery performance.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S8 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S8 Active. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG K92, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S8 Active, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.