Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Holographic white |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has a score of 81.9, which is a bit better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 global score. The Galaxy S8 Active design is just a bit lighter than the LG Stylo 6, but it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little bit better screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution.
LG Stylo 6 features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6's processor is very similar to the Galaxy S8 Active one, both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active and LG Stylo 6 feature incredibly similar battery performance. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with just a bit better camera than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a bigger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active costs a bit more than LG Stylo 6, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.